TP forum Prod

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 106|回复: 13

Trucker speed

  [复制链接]

61

主题

122

帖子

144

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
144
 楼主| 发表于 2019-7-20 04:25:28 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
{"text":null,"videos":"[]","link":"{}","pics":"[{\"description\":\"\",\"height\":1222.0,\"name\":\"\",\"url\":\"\",\"width\":750.0}]","canComment":true}
回复

使用道具 举报

17

主题

905

帖子

294

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
294
发表于 2019-7-20 05:06:21 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
{"replyTo":"","text":"I support this purposed law to limit speeds at 65 mph 🧐","replyToPid":0}
回复 支持 0 反对 4

使用道具 举报

3

主题

314

帖子

719

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
719
发表于 2019-7-21 12:42:25 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层

you get better fuel efficiency, and I believe it is a lot safer. I drive 60 mph personally. I used to drive 70 when I drove for my uncle, I prefer 60.

{"replyToPid":151254,"replyTo":"
462372 发表于 2019-07-20 04:34:30 you get better fuel efficiency, and I believe it is a lot safer. I drive 60 mph personally. I used to drive 70 when I drove for my uncle, I prefer 60.
","text":"except most accidents between trucks and cars are caused by impatient car drivers who just want to get by the slow truck.\n\nhow would slowing them down even more make the impatient drivers less risky and less careless?"}
回复 支持 1 反对 0

使用道具 举报

3

主题

314

帖子

719

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
719
发表于 2019-8-23 06:49:14 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 280160 于 2019-8-23 06:56 编辑

{"replyToPid":0,"replyTo":"","text":"I am not working on gut feeling, but your lack of research shows that you are which is hypocritical.  A simple google search for \"car vs truck fault\" will show you the truth as virtually every site listing statistics will say around 80% of the accidents are caused by cars.\n\nif you truly drive many hours a day like you claim, them you are aware of how cars act around trucks so have no reason to doubt the cause of the accidents.  unless your hours of driving isn't actually in a truck.\n\nof course there are bad truck drivers.  but if you look up all the vehicles in the us, you will see that cars (cars, SUVs, pickups, etc) outnumber semi trucks by over 100 to 1.  You mention trucks only leaving 3-4 second following distance and it being enough for a car.  Are you honestly going to sit there and say that in your hours of driving you see even half the cars on the road leaving close to that much following distance?\n\n70mph is 102ft per second.  Most of the time they are only 1-3 car lengths apart."}
回复 支持 0 反对 1

使用道具 举报

17

主题

905

帖子

294

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
294
发表于 2019-7-21 22:32:51 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层

except most accidents between trucks and cars are caused by impatient car drivers who just want to get by the slow truck. how would slowing them down even more make the impatient drivers less risky and less careless?

本帖最后由 462372 于 2019-7-21 22:34 编辑

{"replyToPid":151846,"replyTo":"
280160 发表于 2019-07-21 04:42:25 except most accidents between trucks and cars are caused by impatient car drivers who just want to get by the slow truck.\n\nhow would slowing them down even more make the impatient drivers less risky and less careless?
","text":"I don't accept your premise as a fact, do you have a source or study for your statistical statement that most accidents are caused by impatient cars? Or are we working with gut feeling?  I also drive many hours a day, my observation is that trucks are the problem, I get passed by every truck except Prime, and most of these trucks leave a 3-4 second following distance. that's enough for a car, but not for a truck.\n\nslowing the trucks down may not make them less careless or reckless, but it will give them more time to react if or should something happen."}
回复 支持 0 反对 1

使用道具 举报

39

主题

409

帖子

332

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
332
发表于 2019-7-20 08:52:35 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
{"replyTo":"
462372 发表于 2019-07-19 21:06:21 I support this purposed law to limit speeds at 65 mph 🧐
","text":"Why","replyToPid":150978}
回复 支持 1 反对 0

使用道具 举报

61

主题

122

帖子

144

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
144
 楼主| 发表于 2019-7-20 09:45:50 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
{"replyTo":"","text":"Why LOL , only lazy can support ","replyToPid":0}
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

17

主题

905

帖子

294

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
294
发表于 2019-7-20 12:34:30 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
{"replyTo":"","text":"you get better fuel efficiency, and I believe it is a lot safer. I drive 60 mph personally. I used to drive 70 when I drove for my uncle, I prefer 60.","replyToPid":151138}
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

17

主题

905

帖子

294

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
294
发表于 2019-7-21 22:31:41 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 462372 于 2019-7-21 22:33 编辑

{"replyToPid":0,"replyTo":"","text":"🧐"}
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

61

主题

122

帖子

144

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
144
 楼主| 发表于 2019-7-24 04:46:48 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
{"replyTo":"","text":"LOL the government needs to shut down the private and companies schools not allow the companies or private to give the CDL’s, The government needs to make DOT schools and to be train educate at least three months by DOT, dan taketake to a different town to pass test then at least six months to drive in Teams not solos LOL , \nThe shipper and receiving 1 or max 2 hours to load or unload no need for all this BS stuff \n80% I met new drivers they just got a CDL and they drive already solo and they don’t know the law , dan the roads will be more safe LOL , not you driving 55-60 mil ph & the cars 70-85 how is more safe?? you must be a real Old crook or a really lazy ass , I drive 60 and 70 and gives me the same Fuel economy LOL. \nThey put the electronica logs because of the accident and sense then tripled the accidents , now instead fix with shippers and receiving they're trying to cut the speed to screw up even more why ??because of the big companies pays them to do that (, \nYou must be driving a pepper log LOL, that’s when I drove old junk and pepper log I used to drive 60 to LOL , ","replyToPid":0}
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

61

主题

122

帖子

144

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
144
 楼主| 发表于 2019-7-24 04:48:24 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
{"replyTo":"
462372 发表于 2019-07-21 14:32:51 I don't accept your premise as a fact, do you have a source or study for your statistical statement that most accidents are caused by impatient cars? Or are we working with gut feeling?  I also drive many hours a day, my observation is that trucks are the problem, I get passed by every truck except Prime, and most of these trucks leave a 3-4 second following distance. that's enough for a car, but not for a truck.\n\nslowing the trucks down may not make them less careless or reckless, but it will give them more time to react if or should something happen.
","text":"I wrote something by the trackpad erased you can go on Apple app review , I posted there","replyToPid":152000}
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|TP

GMT+8, 2025-12-23 17:59 , Processed in 0.074823 second(s), 24 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表