i don't know about this

729917

{"text":"They say there's some sort of driver shortage, but from what I see there are more trucks than cars on 44. Maybe it's actually a shortage of 4-wheelers?","videos":"[]","link":"{}","pics":"[]","canComment":true,"externalShare":false}

78839

{"replyTo":"","text":"OOIDA and other TRUE trucking organizations (ATA is all about trucking corporations) say there is no shortage, it's a retention problem. Most companies have 99-100% turnover. Even sites like FORBES have said it.","replyToPid":0}

836417

{"replyTo":"","text":"ive been saying the same thing. if there was a driver shortage why is there no parking spots lol","replyToPid":0}

78839

{"replyTo":"

729917 发表于 2020-01-22 00:58:06 You'd think with retention problem that large, they'd get the idea that what they're doing isn't working. Nah. it's purposefully like that to create an excuse to replace truckers with self-driving trucks.

","text":"No, the reason they don't care is $$. A $0.48/mile driver replaced by a $0.42/mile saves them money. Not to mention no retirement matching.","replyToPid":309893}

724453

{"replyTo":"","text":"LOL! at the truck stops too","replyToPid":0}

235536

{"replyTo":"

724453 发表于 2020-01-21 01:50:03 LOL! at the truck stops too

","text":"right about that","replyToPid":309081}

884191

{"replyTo":"

78839 发表于 2020-01-21 08:41:05 OOIDA and other TRUE trucking organizations (ATA is all about trucking corporations) say there is no shortage, it's a retention problem. Most companies have 99-100% turnover. Even sites like FORBES have said it.

","text":"💰🇺🇸 = 💩? 🤔......😱","replyToPid":309297}

729917

{"replyTo":"

78839 发表于 2020-01-21 08:41:05 OOIDA and other TRUE trucking organizations (ATA is all about trucking corporations) say there is no shortage, it's a retention problem. Most companies have 99-100% turnover. Even sites like FORBES have said it.

","text":"You'd think with retention problem that large, they'd get the idea that what they're doing isn't working. Nah. it's purposefully like that to create an excuse to replace truckers with self-driving trucks.","replyToPid":309297}

78839

{"replyTo":"

729917 发表于 2020-01-22 00:58:06 You'd think with retention problem that large, they'd get the idea that what they're doing isn't working. Nah. it's purposefully like that to create an excuse to replace truckers with self-driving trucks.

","text":"No, the reason they don't care is $$. A $0.48/mile driver replaced by a $0.42/mile saves them money. Not to mention no retirement matching.","replyToPid":309893}

729917

{"replyTo":"","text":"That doesn't save them money when they're being sued for false advertisement. Why would they advertise, say, .50 and then turn around and pay them .48 or whatever?","replyToPid":0}