Here's the translation: the company is charging $400 for the warning – is that fair?

1687228

{"text":"hey guys! how’s going?\n\nIn Iowa, a cop stopped me because he thought my seatbelt was not adjusted correctly, even though I was wearing it properly. he did an inspection, said everything was fine, but gave me a warning for the seatbelt. now my company wants to fine me $400 because they say this will give them 21 points. does anyone know how much a warning like this actually affects the company’s rating?","videos":"[]","link":"{}","pics":"[]","canComment":true,"externalShare":false}

207357

{"replyTo":"","text":"You know how many offenses companies do driver that they do nothing or very little about....here's one for ya...many companies continue to allow drivers to drop off bad trailers and not look at them and not report the problem...here's another one..you know how some companies will allow at their company terminal inspection bays to for a so called wanna be trailer mechanic to throw a DOT inspection sticker on..that individual is suppose to be certified to do that...I've seen cases where they were not certified..and the list goes on of course...and they want to charge you 400 bucks.. ridiculous...I'd be looking for a new company ..just saying","replyToPid":0}

2457713

{"replyTo":"","text":"If its first time they lost points because of you, they should just warn instead of the monetary penalty.","replyToPid":0}

2371206

{"replyTo":"","text":"they need a secondary reason yo pull you over.. i.e. failure to maintain lane. seatbelt cannot be the only reason to pull you over for.","replyToPid":0}

925557

{"replyTo":"

2371206 发表于 2024-08-29 02:36:44 they need a secondary reason yo pull you over.. i.e. failure to maintain lane. seatbelt cannot be the only reason to pull you over for.

","text":"It depends on the state and wether it's a primary or secondary offense. In Iowa, it is a primary offense and they can pull you over for seatbelt violations.","replyToPid":481659}

1687228

{"replyTo":"","text":"the second reason he wanted to make speeding, that allegedly I drove from the mountain 72, where it is supposed to be 65, to which I said that it is not possible because the trak is locked at 65 and triggers automatic engine break, we can check the video from the cameras, then he made an inspection and found some joint on the air hoses, like a small wear and tear (although they were changed a few months ago). it was second reason..","replyToPid":0}