Pete or KW?

786795

{"text":"If you can only choose one. Which would you choose?  ","videos":"[]","link":"{}","pics":"[{\"description\":\"\",\"height\":457.0,\"name\":\"176214/21_1571083878_1571083878.jpg\",\"url\":\"\",\"width\":960.0}]","canComment":true}

132382

{"replyTo":"","text":"I've owned them both. The last  2 Pete's I had ('01,'03) were not up to standards. The 379's of the middle '90's were the best of the best.  Kenworth W900L flat out beats the the Pete's from the early 2000's to now. I've driven and owned more Pete's than Kenworth's. I'm talking hoods. I know nothing, nor will I ever know anything about aerodynamic trucks. Drove my 1st KW in '78. 1st Pete in '82. First one I bought? You guessed it! A 1973 Astro, complete with a 318 Detroit, 13spd, spring suspension, and 3 piece rims!","replyToPid":0}

586020

{"replyTo":"","text":"Peterbilt ain’t nothing else ","replyToPid":0}

479278

{"replyTo":"","text":"Pete.","replyToPid":0}

706634

{"replyTo":"","text":"Mack.","replyToPid":0}

187295

{"replyTo":"","text":"As long as it has a Cummins...  kw...","replyToPid":0}

655774

{"replyTo":"","text":"1969 mack 18 speed dual stick","replyToPid":0}

705502

{"replyTo":"","text":"KW: more decent ride comfort.","replyToPid":0}

497499

{"replyTo":"","text":"Obviously Peterbilt. Petes are literally KW’s that are rebuilt with better parts. Why would you choose the lesser quality of very similar things? ","replyToPid":0}

281789

{"replyTo":"","text":"either.  I just  favor the older PACCAR. 359 Pete. W900L kw","replyToPid":0}