The proof is in the pudding 😂

929266

{"replyTo":"","text":"And atheist trucker said that their safety record was stellar.....lmao.  Apparently he has a different definition of 'stellar' than the rest of the world.  \n\nAgain, where and when did I do math.  Jazzy's reply is after mine.  Sooo...you waited for someone to post some statistics to finally reply to my question. \n\nIn my comment there is no math and no statistics.  Just stating that you and I have different definitions of the word stellar.  Now, I say to you du.mbass, word definition and math are two very different subjects......du.mbass.","replyToPid":0}

252832

{"replyTo":"

599477 发表于 2020-03-10 17:51:18 “Without any determination as to responsibility” is the key phrase. \n\nSwift has a lot of trucks on the road, so statistically they are going to be “involved” in accidents. I’m not saying they are all good drivers, but this does not state what percentage of those crashes had Swift at fault. \n\nEdit:\nI did some math for fun. \nAccording to the most recent statistics on the FMCSA website, there were 450,000 crashes involving large trucks in 2017 (source: https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety/data-and-statistics/large-truck-and-bus-crash-facts-2017#A4 )\n\nUsing that number as a base and assuming that Swift was at fault for every single accident they were involved in:\nThere would be a total of 900,000 crashes in 24 months. 1478 Swift crashes / 900,000 total = 0.16% of all truck crashes involved Swift trucks.

","text":"😑😑😑","replyToPid":341794}

599477

{"replyTo":"

252832 发表于 2020-03-10 18:47:07 😑😑😑

","text":"😁","replyToPid":341807}

674786

{"replyTo":"","text":"I started off at Swift and glad I’m not there anymore. Ever since Knight partnered with them they harp on safety more. If you get 85 points your terminated.  The company I’m with now doesn’t have cameras or lane departures. ","replyToPid":0}

255377

{"replyTo":"

462372 发表于 2020-03-10 09:35:36 they have 15,893 power units. 1500 crashes in 24 months is stellar, that's less than 1% crash for two years. Best in Class.

","text":"1500 is 10 percent of 15,000 though so it’s 5 percent annually. ","replyToPid":341685}

255377

{"replyToPid":341794,"replyTo":"

599477 发表于 2020-03-10 17:51:18 “Without any determination as to responsibility” is the key phrase. \n\nSwift has a lot of trucks on the road, so statistically they are going to be “involved” in accidents. I’m not saying they are all good drivers, but this does not state what percentage of those crashes had Swift at fault. \n\nEdit:\nI did some math for fun. \nAccording to the most recent statistics on the FMCSA website, there were 450,000 crashes involving large trucks in 2017 (source: https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/safety/data-and-statistics/large-truck-and-bus-crash-facts-2017#A4 )\n\nUsing that number as a base and assuming that Swift was at fault for every single accident they were involved in:\nThere would be a total of 900,000 crashes in 24 months. 1478 Swift crashes / 900,000 total = 0.16% of all truck crashes involved Swift trucks.

","text":"I did some math, uh oh. 🤣 there were about 2 million commercial trucks registered in the USA in 2017. Of those, about 4,000 were involved in a fatality. That’s 1 in 500. Swift reports about 20,000 drivers and had about 20 fatality accidents per year over the last 2. So that’s 1 in 1000. Half the national average. Both are too high but Swift is safe compared to national averages. The injuries are another subject but at least you can come back from that most of the time. "}

931511

{"replyTo":"","text":"Swift is always at fault.","replyToPid":0}

929266

{"replyTo":"

462372 发表于 2020-03-10 09:35:36 they have 15,893 power units. 1500 crashes in 24 months is stellar, that's less than 1% crash for two years. Best in Class.

","text":"lmfao...that's closer to 11% tard.  15,893/1,500= 10.59%","replyToPid":341685}

462372

{"replyTo":"

929266 发表于 2020-03-10 21:07:59 lmfao...that's closer to 11% tard.  15,893/1,500= 10.59%

","text":"but then divide by 24 months.","replyToPid":341873}

462372

{"replyTo":"

803190 发表于 2020-03-10 16:45:05 There are no words for this level of $tupidity

","text":"there are words to express everything, you just might not be articulate enough, which says enough about you.","replyToPid":341778}